Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGRMT NO KRGSA16-002(3)AGREEMENT NO. KRGSA 16-002(3) AMENDMENT NO. THREE (3) TO AGREEMENT NO. KRGSA 16-002 THIS AMENDMENT NO. THREE (3) TO AGREEMENT NO. KRGSA 16-002 is made and entered into on APR - L 2019 , by and between the KERN RIVER GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY (referred to herein as "KRGSA"), and TODD GROUNDWATER, a small business enterprise (referred to herein as "CONTRACTOR"). Each party may be referred to individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, on August 4, 2016, KRGSA and CONTRACTOR entered into Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002, to develop and implement a strategic approach to comply with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 ("SGMA") by preparing a Groundwater Sustainability Plan ("GSP") as outlined in a "Scope of Work 1 "; and WHEREAS, in April 2017 the parties entered into Amendment No. One (1) to Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002, to expand the Scope of Work in the original contract to include developing a Subbasin-wide water budget utilizing the C2VSim referred to as "Scope of Work 2" and also agreed to provide for additional compensation above the original compensation to perform Scope of Work 2; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2018 the parties entered into Amendment No. Two (2) to Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002, to provide additional compensation to address coordination with the KGA (task 7 in the original proposal), budget overages on technical analyses (tasks 1 and 2 in the original proposal) and future costs for GSP development, such as analysis of climate change scenario now being required by DWR (task 5 in the original proposal); and WHEREAS, the parties desire to Amend Agreement No. 16-002 again to add additional compensation to cover tasks associated with Scope of Work 1; preparing a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) as reference in Exhibit A of original Agreement KRGSA 16-002; and WHEREAS, the additional compensation is needed to address remaining analysis and studies to complete the GSP as outlined in EXHIBIT "D", incorporated herein; and Amendment 3 to Agreement No. KRGSA 16 W2 C'.\Users\LreM\Appdota\Local\Microsoft\Windows\lnet[ache\Content.Outlook\L22JZSZ\Todd Amd 3 To Agr KRGSAI6-W2_Flnol Docx Moron 27, 2019 t AGENCY -- Page 1 of 3 Pages -- jOR1GINAL WHEREAS, KRGSA and Contractor have agreed to additional compensation of One Hundred Seventy -Three Thousand, Twenty -Nine Dollars ($173,029) to complete GSP tasks (Scope One Work) as shown in Exhibit C. NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals herein, KRGSA and CONTRACTOR mutually agree to amend Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002 as follows: 1. Section 1 of Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002 entitled "Scope of Work" is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. SCOPE OF WORK. The scope of work is described as: assisting the KRGSA in developing and implementing a strategic approach to comply with the SGMA and as further described in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B,", and Exhibit "C" attached and incorporated to Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002 and Amendments 1 and 2, and Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The scope of work shall include all items and procedures necessary to properly complete the task CONTRACTOR has been hired to perform, whether specifically included in the scope of work or not. 2. Section 2 of Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002 entitled "Compensation" is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. COMPENSATION. Compensation for all work, services or products called for under this Agreement shall consist of a total payment not to exceed Three Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($360,000) to perform Scope of Work 1, Four Hundred Thirty -One Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty Seven Dollars ($431,957) to perform Scope of Work 2, One Hundred Ninety Thousand Dollars ($190,000) to perform the additional Task work described in Amendment 2, and $173,029 to perform additional tasks described herein, for a total amount not to exceed One Million One Hundred Fifty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Eighty Six Dollars ($1,154,986). The compensation set forth in this section shall be the total compensation under this Agreement including, but not limited to, all out-of-pocket costs and taxes. KRGSA shall pay only the compensation listed unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. Amendment 3 to Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002 C.\Users\lrezo\Appdptp\Local\MicrosoB\H'ImJows\InetCoChe\ContenLOotlook\L22JZ55Z\Todd.Amd 3 To Agr KRGSAI6-002_Pin. Do� M°"" v, tow f ZEIZt -- Page 2 of 3 Pages -- �OAIGINAL 3. Except as amended herein, all other provisions of Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002 shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. Three (3) to Agreement No. KRGSA 16-002 to be executed the day and year first above Written. KRGSA KERN RIVER GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGE By: RODNEY PALLA Chairman CITY OF BAKERSFIELD WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT By: - ART CHIANELLO Water Resources Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: VIRGINIA GE RO City Attorn By VI INIA G NARO City Attorney COUNTERSIGNED: By: NELSO SMITH Finance Director VGtlllvlg Attachment: Exhibit D CONTRACTOR TODD GROUNDWATER By: 9.1,e PHYLLIS STANIN Vice President KERN DELTA WATER DISTRICT BY M c L. MARK MULKA General Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROBERT HARTSOCK Attorneys for Kern Delta Water District APP OVER AS TO FORM: By: AMELIA T. MINABRRI ARAI General Counsel Amendment 3 to Agreement No. KRGSA 16002 Ct\Users\Lrezp\AppCalo\Loral\Microsoft\Wintlows\lnetcache\ContenLOWlook\o2JZ55Z\Sodd.Am03 To Agr KRGSA) 6-002_Final.Docx , Mardh 2, 2019 I AGEtw^r r -- Page 3 of 3 Pages -- I r>)RiIiVAL TODD= GROUNDWATER February 27, 2019 MEMORANDUM To: Kern River Groundwater Sustainability Agency (KRGSA) Art Chianello, David Beard, and Mark Mulkay From: Phyllis Stanin Re: Request for Budget Amendment Preparation of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) The Kern River Groundwater Sustainability Agency (KRGSA) is entering the final stage of GSP development in 2019 and significant work remains to be accomplished in a relatively short timeframe. As drafts of the first three chapters of the GSP are being completed for review over the next few weeks (Administrative Information, Plan Area, and Basin Setting), analyses of both sustainability criteria and management actions/projects are progressing. These tasks are critical to the projected future water budget modeling that is already underway. In a recent working session, GSP managers and Todd Groundwater developed a plan for completing these analyses. We will be working closely with each manager to incorporate agency -specific details. Several working sessions are already scheduled for early March. In order to complete these analyses and the GSP document, Todd Groundwater is requesting an amendment to our current budget. As of March 1, we have about $100,000 remaining in our GSP budget, almost all of which is now dedicated to the Subbasin modeling of projected future water budgets. This amendment request is needed to complete the sustainability criteria analysis, conduct sufficient analyses of projects and management actions to provide them to the modeling team, and to cover the coordination and development of the GSP document. 1 NEED FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT When the original scope of services for the GSP was developed in 2016, the Kern County Subbasin modeling process was not known. Our original modeling scope did not envision a basin -wide model for evaluation of management scenarios. In late 2018, DWR published additional guidance for this process, which was incorporated into our modeling scope of work approved over the last few months. Our remaining budget was allocated to the development and evaluation of management actions—this budget that has now been dedicated to the protected future water budget modeling, vet additional GSP analyses and tasks must also be completed. 2490 Mariner Square Loop, Suite 215 1 Alameda, CA 94501 1 510 747 6920 1 toddgroundwater.com FAOFJ�C'Lt g We have identified a need for additional analysis of management actions. The model baseline development will necessarily include different water supply projections than previously understood and the GSP must address these changes. Specifically, the lower projections of imported water by DWR and the decreases in river flow from the climate change analysis will create a need for additional projects and management actions in the KRGSA. Details of these projects will need to be sufficiently developed for modeling purposes and the analysis needs to be completed in a short amount of time. As the managers are aware, the historical water budget analysis warranted a larger level of effort than envisioned in mid -2018. Water recharged inside the KRGSA on behalf of others required quantification; similarly, water banked outside of the KRGSA on behalf of member agencies also required investigation. Monthly analysis has now been completed of all inflows and outflows over a 20 -year study period for the large KRGSA area, including the ownership of banked water, and is being compared to final results from the numerical model. Although now complete, the budget for this task was exceeded. The previously developed GSP sections for the hvdrogeologic conceptual model and groundwater conditions have required ongoing modification to be consistent with information being developed by others. For example, recent input from Chevron on exempt aquifers requires revisions to the basin analysis in the KRGSA. Input from other water purveyors, including Cal Water, have identified the need for additional sustainability analyses. In addition, figures and analyses require modification to incorporate the new KRGSA boundary revisions. Revisions to the KRGSA boundary and recent changes associated with County lands also affect the definition and delineation of the KRGSA Plan Area as defined by GSP regulations. All these activities (among others) have required numerous revisions to the early sections of the Administrative Draft GSP. 2 ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 Complete Sustainability Criteria Analysis Our current scope included a limited budget for analysis of the five sustainability indicators for the KRGSA and selections of reasonable minimum thresholds for each. Preliminary analyses indicate the need for differing thresholds to accommodate banking, municipal well operations, areas of subsidence, and groundwater quality. Thresholds must be developed for each of the three Management Areas and coordinated such that high thresholds in one area can be achieved while low thresholds elsewhere can be accommodated. The definition of undesirable results must also work within the construct of the previously -approved definitions of undesirable results developed for the entire Subbasin. The technical approach for selection of minimum thresholds in each Management Area was reviewed with the KRGSA Managers at a meeting in February 2019. Additional work is now needed to finalize draft minimum thresholds including review of banking CEQA documents and data, review of municipal well construction with respect to historic low water levels, correlation of water levels to water quality concerns, and assessment of potential actions that could achieve higher minimum threshold values. Based on the anticipated level of effort needed to complete the analysis, we request $22,355 for completion of this task. Budget Amendment Request/KRGSA GSP 2 TODD GROUNDWATER 0*�F4C'f 2.2 Evaluate Interconnected Surface Water and Environmental Uses In October 2018, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) provided recommendations to KRGSA managers for incorporating environmental uses of surface water into our GSP. Data provided from TNC included local freshwater species in the Kern River, field descriptions, and vegetation/wetlands maps. Vegetation maps (developed by DWR and TNC and referred to as Natural Communities Commonly Associated with Groundwater) have suggested areas where ecosystems may be dependent on groundwater (GDEs). These maps identify vegetation areas along the Kern River corridor and clusters of parcels in about 20 separate areas south of the Kern River throughout Kern Delta Water District. For this task, we propose a focused analysis of local groundwater conditions and depth for each of the mapped areas, including local hydrographs where available. We note that the vegetation maps and ecological data were developed without reference to Kern River management or depth to the water table along the river. Accordingly, the maps do not necessarily represent interconnected surface water as defined by SGMA. If needed, Todd Groundwater's Senior Hydrologist can lend specialized expertise in groundwater/surface water interaction to this analysis; he has been conducting similar analyses for other ongoing GSPs. Based on the anticipated level of effort, we request $15,245 for this new task. 2.3 Identify Management Actions and Provide Details for Modeling Projects to optimize conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater have been identified by KRGSA managers to support the Sustainability Goal. We are working with the City to identify areas and amounts where optimized recharge could benefit operation of municipal wells and water quality. Recent operational changes by KDWD will also contribute to the KRGSA Sustainability Goal. ID4 is developing strategies to ensure water supply at its water purification plant and provision of water supply to KRGSA agencies. We also need to coordinate with other water purveyors and agencies in the KRGSA for a complete accounting of management actions. Recent conversations with both East Niles Community Services District and California Water Service Company identified ongoing management strategies to incorporate into the GSP. In addition, banking operations at Berrenda Mesa need to be coordinated with adjacent banking areas by the City and others. Based on our current understanding of projects and actions, we request $42,432 for this task. 2.4 Prepare GSP Implementation Plan and GSP Document We are concurrently preparing GSP sections while other analyses are ongoing. This is necessary to meet the expedited schedule of the Su bbasin. Considering the additional information to be assimilated, analyses to be conducted, and coordination among organizations noted above, preparation of the GSP document and Implementation Plan is more complex and detailed than initially recognized. We will work with KRGSA managers on a schedule of deliverables to allow the KRGSA Managers and Board time for review and consideration as well as time for coordination with others. For Draft and Final documents of the GSP and Implementation Plan, we request $68,040 for this task. Budget Amendment Request /KRGSA GSP 3 TODD GROUNDWATER �At,`F.fw`( 0ii1G! 4AL 2.5 Additional Coordination with KGA and Adjacent GSAs Finally, there is a continuing need for meetings, conference calls, document revisions, and other coordination steps with the KGA and others to make sure that all Subbasin GSPS being developed are sufficiently consistent and comply with GSP regulations for coordination. Based on recent levels of effort required, we request $24,957 for this task. 3 BUDGET AMENDMENT SUMMARY The table below presents the total budget amendment request of $173,029 on a task basis and summarizes the need for each request as described above. (Section 2.1 above) thresholds including water quality concerns for municipal wells. Select appropriate monitoring $22.355 locations for thresholds. Evaluate Interconnected New task reviewing vegetation mapping Surface Water (Section provided by DAR in 2018 and considering $15,245 2.2 above) recommendations by TNC. '.. Management Actions Select projects and actions based on input from (Section 2.3 above) KRGSA agencies and develop details to provide $42,432 to Subbasin modeling team for future projected water budgets., GSP Implementation New task to develop required Implementation Plan and Document Plan. Incorporate tasks on Administrative Draft (Section 2.4 above) sections and prepare Draft and Final GSP $68,040 document. Additional Coordination '�. Develop Management Projects and Actions with others (Section2.5 $24,957 above) TOTAL BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST: $173,029 This budget amendment will supplement the current remaining amount of Todd Groundwater budget that has been now dedicated to the project water budget modeling and willprovide a path forward to complete the GSP process. The draft GSP document will need to be completed by early summer to allow KRGSA comments, public review, and coordination with others. We are committed to meeting that goal. Budget Amendment Request /KRGSA GSP 4 TODD GROUNDWATER jj��:iiClt@AL s